Jill Long-Thompson is still short on signatures. As reported by Blue Indiana, here’s what she lacks.

4th – 91
5th – 38
7th – 87
8th – 221 (Schellinger is still showing that he needs hundreds here, so the 8th may not use the statewide reporting system.)
9th – 34

Total 471.

In addition, the pro-choice baby killers at Emily’s List PAC have tossed more money at Long-Thompson’s campaign, contributing $100,000 last Friday, (see PDF here) bringing their total investment in the LT campaign to $150,000.

DT

Last 5 posts by admin

• We don't really know how many jobs we saved, but we lost 467,000 in June - July 3rd, 2009
• More possible GPS snooping by the guberment - July 2nd, 2009
• Too liberal. Hell, that's what we've been telling you all along - July 1st, 2009
• Cellular 911 service restored - July 1st, 2009
• Dumbocrats refuse to stand for pledge of allegiance - July 1st, 2009

Related posts:

1. Hello? Does anyone here really support Jill Long-Thompson? I’ve
2. Long-Thompson supporters <– Sour Grapes Sometimes
3. Long-Thompson – Bigger government is better Proceed c
4. Follow the money, honey. Nikki and
5. Mitch Daniels gains in recent poll, Long-Thompson slips further behind From Surve

This entry was posted on Monday, February 18th, 2008 at 1:41 pm and is filed under Politics, Pro-life. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.